🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.